Thank you. I would mention perhaps two things here.
One is the impact on human rights. I think the behaviour, if I may say so, of international oil companies has changed a little bit. In the past, just to open oil fields, a population would have to be cleared forcefully, so a lot of people in south Sudan have just been pushed to the swamps. It's a very inhospitable environment, as you may know, and it was done without compensation, without anything like that. A lot of human rights were violated just for the sake of oil exploration.
It has become a little more visible now, and most of the companies--including Chinese, Indian, and Malaysian companies--are now trying to compensate the population for dislodging them from their region. More infrastructure is being built. More roads are being built. Schools are being built for communities. Now there is more dialogue with communities than there was in the past. It's not perfect--far from it, and there is still a lot of progress to make--but I think there is awareness among the big players that they need to be accepted by the local population. It's not enough to have a deal with Khartoum, and the Chinese have realized that very quickly, or even a deal with Juba. It's not enough to have a deal with the leadership; they also have to be accepted locally.
In recent times, some of the installations have been attacked by JEM in south Kordofan, one of the transition areas. One of the rebel groups in Darfur attacked these installations because they see Chinese installations as supporting the budget of the government they are fighting, so they are targeting the nerve of the war, to be explicit. This is an issue, and that's why, to come back to the question of the gentleman here, it's important that oil revenues be shared and that the government of south Sudan be seen as sharing the revenues quite fairly with the population and with the various regions. This is not the case right now.
China in particular, I think, has generally changed its attitude towards the population and government of south Sudan. They have invited the leader of south Sudan to Beijing to discuss the future post-referendum. Interestingly, they have also contributed peacekeepers to UNMIS in certain regions of the south. It's basically a show. They're trying to show that they're doing some good for the local population, so there's a lot of marketing happening, more now than before. There are a few western companies. There's a Swedish company there in south Sudan, and of course they are the avant-garde of compensation packages and so on for the local population.