For the record, the Minister of Foreign Affairs had already made the decision previously on whether he was going to issue a travelling document or not. He had already made that statement.
The issue that is coming up now is that the matter went in front of a court, and a court made a decision on that, right? A decision was made by the court. Therefore, at this current given time, the government is bound to what the court said at this current time, which is why the letter came. So I'll make it very clear: the government has to decide what it is going to do with the court decision. That decision has not been made. That is in the letter--not what Mr. Dewar was saying.
So I've made my point clear?