Yes, I think there is a fairly clear hierarchy. Definitely auto and manufacturing are areas in which Canadians recognize that there are high degrees of interdependence, and these would probably be areas for which having common regulatory approaches would make sense.
Security is another area, and Canadians say this mindful of the problems of a border that has become increasingly less porous and more difficult to negotiate, and that has had a corrosive impact on trade. The figures are actually quite alarming if you look at the patterns over the last six or seven years. They work hand in hand with the rising protectionist--perhaps even isolationist--sentiment that's been present in the United States. I don't think you'd have to go much beyond those areas to identify some areas on which Canadians would like to see some attention focused. This is not necessary just at the Washington-to-Ottawa level. A lot of this is probably just as effectively, if not more effectively, handled at a sub-national, province-to-province, business-to-business level.
Right now I am concerned that we aren't in a position to make this case very forcefully. We hear a lot of spurious claims about what Americans think about Canada and its relative threat value and so forth. I think it would be really valuable to quickly, with key audiences, assemble the case that some of those perceptions are in fact inconsistent with what members of the American public themselves are saying.