Gerry Byrne at the Foreign Affairs and International Development Committee

On October 6th, 2009. See this statement in context.

October 6th, 2009 / 10:40 a.m.

Liberal

Gerry Byrne Liberal Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte, NL

So what you're saying, then, is that there is still an objection procedure and there is still a lengthy procedure within NAFO itself. NAFO has to concur with the ad hoc panel or the recommendations. If the objecting contracting party does not agree with the NAFO review of the ad hoc panel, they can continue the objection and continue to fish unilaterally, and then they have the option of raising it to a provision within UNFA or UNCLOS, which is the International Court of Justice.

Am I reading that correctly?

See context to find out what was said next.