No, but let's look at the proverbial whole of government, if I can just try to break down the silos. A minister who's getting a complaint is going to want to draw information from the whole of the Canadian government on the activity in question. You have information from Peru, Colombia, or wherever, that names a company and describes what they're doing. My sense is that the Canadian embassies in these countries are very knowledgeable about what these companies are engaging in, and their local representatives are in touch with the embassy all the time. So how would Bill C-300 be incompatible with the work that you're doing?
I have no objection to the work you're doing. I think it's important. But I don't quite understand how Bill C-300 would be seen as incompatible with it. I think Mr. McKay put it well this morning when he said that you have to look at Bill C-300 as being simply the last two steps of the round table that the government decided not to implement. We could probably solve most of our problems if we gave the counsellor a couple of powers she doesn't now have. I think this would resolve any conflict, perceived or real, between what Mr. McKay is proposing and what the government has already outlined.