I think I was unclear. An investigation regarding a case that has been operating for some time and around which there are problems would concern that case. If that mine is still operating, but it's now operating to a standard that complies with standards included in the statute, then that company would qualify for further government support.
The statute applies to current operations. If there were a mine, let's say Omai, where there were problems in the past but it's still operated by a Canadian company and there are no problems there now—the company now operates in a way that's consistent with these standards—then that company, obviously, would be eligible for further government support.
This act doesn't address legal remedies. It doesn't provide legal remedies to people who have been wronged in the past. But if there are still problems with a mine where there have been problems before, and an investigation happens, then that company could become ineligible for further support.
But no, it doesn't do anything to companies that have committed wrongs for which people have been unable to access remedies. It doesn't provide a legal remedy.