That's “any other standard consistent with international human rights”. Well, the standard articulated in paragraphs 5(2)(a) to (c) is quite comprehensive. If the IFC's performance standards and accompanying guidance notes, the voluntary principles, and provisions that include the full complement of our international human rights obligations are included, that would be extremely comprehensive.
Paragraph 5(2)(d) could include other international treaties to which we're a signatory. Perhaps it could include environmental treaties, because paragraph 5(2)(c) specifically speaks to human rights. I'm thinking of things like the treaties around biodiversity and those concerning climate change and so on that wouldn't necessarily be considered in paragraph 5(2)(c), but that have a bearing on these projects.
Some provisions in those treaties might be covered off in the performance standards, but likely some wouldn't, so that could include environmental treaties. Apart from that, I think the standard that's articulated is quite comprehensive.