I'll make it very brief, but I think you've answered the question to a large extent just now and in your remarks to Madame Lalonde.
Part of the concern we have is this transference of responsibility when the host country itself lacks capacity for appropriately regulating and lacks human rights standards compared to anything Canada and most parts of the world adhere to. One of the first pillars in our strategy in Canada is developing, through CIDA, capacity in those nations. I think at this stage if we jump ahead and start imposing standards that might be appropriate in Canada on nations that lack the human rights capacity in the government itself or the capacity to regulate, we can lose opportunities to have this kind of influence.
I don't know whether you can add to what you said, but I think that's my big concern, that the countries themselves...and Sudan was probably a good example, with Talisman, one of the worst human rights abusers. We're all concerned about Darfur, but by pushing a company right out of the country, have we really advanced the cause of human rights in that nation?