We believe that working with the company to try to remedy a situation and make it as good as it can possibly be is the best method of doing this. There is a huge issue of the transference of responsibility, and companies that go into countries that are less developed have a very difficult time with that. You can think of it as their agreeing to set up a medical clinic or a school, and they become the government. A good company will say, we'll put the infrastructure in place, but we need the local government to pay for the teachers, to pay for the doctors, to get the local government involved to ensure there is an ongoing commitment from the country. There are situations where laws in the country are put in place, and it's clear that they're not going to be able to enforce or monitor them. So there's a natural inclination to say, company, you have to do that.
I think companies that are doing a good job, the types that we support, do that to an extent, but to impose on them an absolute requirement that would mean they'd lose support from us and our ability to work with them and try to remedy situations and make them better, I think, is completely unfair to the companies and puts them in a situation where they will not be able to take chances, they will not be able to go into difficult situations, because they'll never know, no matter how hard they try, whether or not they're going to be accused of doing something and they will jeopardize themselves.