If you look, for instance, at the Canada-Europe relationship, there are a number of formal institutions. There's a formal annual summit, there is a formal semi-annual meeting of senior officials, there are a number of committees. There is nothing between Canada and the United States of a similar nature. But given the extent and the depth of that relationship, it's a relationship that just cries out for better management.
So what you have is an awful lot of informal, below-the-radar relationships, hundreds of relationships among officials and so on, but none of them are provided with a kind of from-the-top political guidance as to what the objectives are. So I'd like to fill that gap between the adhocery, which we have seen, and that vast network of relationships by setting up a number of institutions that would require reporting by these people, on an occasional basis, on what they're doing and why they're doing it, and by providing them with instructions as to what the priorities should be.