Let me make two broad comments on that. The first one is on the security and prosperity initiative, which dominated the agenda over the last seven or eight years. I think that agenda has been largely met. It was an agenda to see what could be done within existing regulatory strengths by the two governments. It was largely exhausted three or four years ago because the two governments took the view that they were not going to pursue anything that would require them to seek legislative change, and they had exhausted that particular agenda. I think they need to move beyond that agenda because I think there are things they need to do that may require legislative changes.
In order to do that, we need to have an open dialogue among Canadians, but also among Canadians and Americans to look at what we're doing, why we are doing it, what we are achieving. I see no reason that cannot be done in a much more transparent way than was the case with the security and prosperity initiative, although to tell you the truth, I don't think there was nearly as much there as people feared. I think there was much more talk about what might be there than what actually was there, and there wasn't all that much to it.