Do you think it's unreasonable...? You mentioned the EDC, and Mr. McArdle was here. The EDC has developed a policy, along with the World Bank and everybody else, on environmental guidelines. The International Finance Corporation has done the same thing. Those environmental guidelines are well established, and if you don't meet those guidelines you don't get the financing.
Why would EDC not take into account a report from the counsellor that said that from all the evidence she has seen, this company would appear to have been party to serious breaches of human rights obligations under well-established international standards, and therefore they're not in a position to finance their operation?
I hear the statements that are being made, but it seems to me that the statements about the consequences go way beyond the actual effect of what is being suggested.