Good. Thank you.
I have one quick technical question. There was a movement afoot during the more troublesome times historically with Rights and Democracy to do amendments on clauses, certainly on clause 19 of the bylaw, which has to do with the mandate relative to the executive performance review committee.
I don't think there were any movements afoot to do an amendment, but I would like your comment on how acceptable you find clause 20 as provided in the act: that the president is the chief executive officer of the centre and shall supervise and direct the work of the centre in accordance with the policies established by the board. In other words, there is a pecking order established here.
So it's really two questions. Number one, are you comfortable with the bylaws as they are written with respect to executive performance review committee? Number two, are you comfortable with the fact that the policies for Rights and Democracy will be established by the board?