You're absolutely right. All the MDGs are interconnected, and I'm pleased you're mentioning MDG 8, because that's an effective development partnership. We would not be able to achieve the results on MDGs 4, 5, and 6--children, maternal mortality, and the diseases--unless we initiated a new kind of development partnership at the country level. In every country where we invest, we demand a round table, which we call the country coordinating mechanism, at which the governments, civil society, and the private sector come together to discuss the needs of the country, define together what the priorities are, and then submit their proposal.
That is not without challenge in countries where you perhaps don't have a tradition of a participatory democratic process, but this method has forced countries to develop this kind of partnership, and this clearly improved over time. You cannot fight these diseases or achieve other development goals unless you involve civil society and the private sector also. Governments today cannot achieve those results by themselves.
So I do believe that the Global Fund model also offers some interesting lessons that go beyond those diseases, actually, and affect the millennium development goals more broadly. That is certainly something that can be applied also in the future.