No. I think the bill suffers from a fundamental flaw, which can't be fixed by amendment. Frankly, I think it comes back to some of the issues that have been raised both by Professor Simons and by our colleagues from Harvard here.
Essentially, in the examples they were talking about, their issue wasn't so much with whether a company was behaving in a socially responsible way but was more about whether the government of the country involved was maintaining rule of law. We just heard some suggestions from Ms. Knuckey. The government has an obligation to investigate, and where the government has no capacity, the company has to take on a state responsibility.
I read that as saying that we want a bill passed by the Canadian Parliament to tell Canadian companies to judge for themselves whether to override the sovereign power of another state, to judge for themselves whether they're operating in a failed state and therefore take on state roles like investigation and punishment.
I find that an astonishing principle for the Government of Canada to want to uphold. I would be very surprised if your party would stand up for the notion that companies should override the authority of sovereign governments.