Well, that would certainly be better than what we have now, which is a counsellor with the capacity to investigate only where the parties agree, meaning that a company can state that it doesn't want any investigation into a particular situation.
Having an ombudsman would be better than what we have now, but I still think that having this type of mechanism to engage an investigation with regard to allegations, with sanctions, makes much more sense. Because if you don't have sanctions, then there's not much incentive to comply, apart from the reputational incentive, which then you have to investigate to make sure they're actually complying.