Far be it from me to advise any country on either existing or possible changes.
A number of countries of Central America, a number of Latin American countries, have that one-term limit—Colombia, Nicaragua—and that is an issue from time to time. In many ways, I think strong arguments can be made for the history of single-term governments, because they encourage democratic turnover and evolution. Many of the cases in which we have seen controversial challenges to that concept—in places such as Venezuela or Honduras or Nicaragua or Colombia—have brought those countries into various levels of political disaccord, or even crisis.
I don't think the single-term concept is necessarily a bad one. Some of those whom we've seen advocate irresponsibly for constitutional change would actually argue in favour, I think, of maintaining it, because otherwise you have those who would try to place themselves in power on a perpetual basis.