I'll try to answer the first question.
The Church—capital C—while it's engaged and everything, can't be overrun with everything. It just doesn't have the capacity to do that. I suppose during the seventies and eighties and maybe into the nineties, there was the women's desk, there was the income-generating desk, there was this desk and there was that desk. A lot of that just sort of took the focus of the church away from its theological reflection and pastoral responsibilities and prophetic role. So we certainly are mindful of that.
You may remember that during the civil war the New Sudan Council of Churches, working in the SPLMA areas, was operating out of Nairobi. And the Sudan Council of Churches was working out of Khartoum. That's been a long process of bringing these groups together now and sorting out management issues inside and so forth. So we certainly don't want to burden the churches as such with the massive influx of people—IDPs coming from north to south and so forth.
But I think the ecumenical community is set up to have.... Out of Geneva we have the Action by Churches Together, which engages the church partners on the ground but doesn't overwhelm them, or intends to not overwhelm them. The same with Caritas, and they bring in some expertise.
So I think probably the humanitarian side of CIDA would do well to look at how they can help but not overwhelm the Church. But the Church will be there to suffer with the people, whatever happens, and it's basically to give a voice for voiceless people, when their views are not heard otherwise by governments and so forth. That's why they're there, so that's very important.
I don't know if that answers the question. We don't want to overwhelm the Church with what can happen without it, but it needs to be listened to.