Let me start, and my colleague will support me as needed.
When you go in, as we have stated, you go long term. And the partners as well, more and more—particularly in the economies that have now moved from the command economy into market economy—are more sophisticated in knowing about their needs and where they want to go. In the beginning it was very much more ad hoc and they were not quite sure how their societies and their systems and institutions would evolve, but nowadays they are very much more confirmed in their understanding of where they want to go and how they want to achieve that. Therefore, their expectation is also much more long term, so during the course of the collaboration you would mature together to an understanding where life is going to be beyond these four years or whatever the duration of the project is.
As we said, it is never static. It is an evolving situation where you have to be very open and very adaptable in the framework, of course, that the program is giving you, the mandate you have to respond to, how society and in this case, of course, the government is moving, and how its demands are coming forward. Some of them you are able to meet as predicted and as the project design had foreseen, but some of them are emerging when you work with them, and that then leads to either that you go back to the funder and discuss the possibility of an extension or a new project, or it can also lead the beneficiary to go to another funder. It can lead, in the Ukrainian case, to seeking funding from other sources.