Good.
I asked the question, what is going to be accomplished by this committee that could not be accomplished by the staff speaking to a television camera? I don't understand why this committee would be taking time to listen to that.
I do understand that if we have professors who can come and can give fresh new information to us again in public, in this public domain, we could listen to their criticism of previous happenings and build from those criticisms to where we should be going, where Rights and Democracy should be going.
I can see certainly the committee carrying out its responsibility—and this is a responsibility—of questioning the new chair.
I'm sorry. Is it the chair or the president?