Ms. Biggs, I was just reviewing some notes here, and I find it absolutely amazing how you handle all of the complications of the large amounts of grants that have been put through. Specifically just for Haiti--and these are all additional to what had been previously committed--you have Haiti with the earthquake; Haiti with the cholera; Haiti with the reconstruction; with the G-8, $1.1 billion for Africa; and with the G-20, $325 million. Then there was Pakistan, too. It is my understanding that all of these would be in addition to what had been on long-term commitments and what you could foresee to be planning for on a long-term basis.
These are emergency commitments that would come up. This would have an impact on, I would think, literally hundreds of millions of people. It would be a huge number of people. So when we're trying to make decisions based on how many people it will have an impact on and what we need to do now, it must take a tremendous amount of resolve to go through even a lot of good applications that have to be turned down, because you just have to fit in what is the highest priority and should be done first.
Perhaps you could comment on that, because I think that's a point that has been missed here. This is a very, very significant number of additional commitments that have to be made. Obviously, some have to stay and some have to go, and you have to make a decision along the way on that, particularly on the African commitments, because those were very substantial.