I want to return to the question of governance—you characterized it as a challenge—because in my visit in 2006 I would go so far as to say it was a disaster then, before the earthquake, so little had been done. At that time there was a serious problem with the governance too, and it would certainly sound as though that continues to this day.
Even on this land acquisition difficulty, most countries, in Canada too, if they need land for emergency circumstances or conditions they will confiscate it or appropriate it or annex it or whatever. It certainly sounds as though this is the biggest problem in finding some vehicle, and I really think that by onesie-twosie, getting one piece of property freed or registered, that's going to take forever to go through for the amount of property you need. And quite frankly, that just might complicate the system even more. But if a government were able to appropriate 1,000 acres of land and get to the work of building something on it, that would certainly sound as though that's the better way to go. And then the question goes back to—it certainly is indicated here—whether the governance is at such a low level that the government cannot do that. Is that what it is?
The United Nations intervenes in other circumstances. Is there a role for a government intervention to be able to move this issue forward?