When it comes to the hospital, we're rebuilding where it is presently. We were looking at other pieces of property, but where the ministry has landed on is where they have the present hospital, so it's reconstruction. So for land, for that piece, I think we're fine. The other piece is huge, and that was what stymied us from the beginning: how do we put shelters on properties where we don't know who the owners are or where they are located? They might be in Miami. They might be in Santo Domingo. They're in other places, other parts of the world.
We brought a system together that acknowledges, through the neighbours and the local authorities, that this person was residing on that piece of land before. He was a tenant before, and they all agree that the owner to whom he pays his rent is this particular person, and it is signed off by the CASEC who is the local municipal government employee. We built this system, consistent with all the other Red Crosses, because we didn't want to all have different systems from different Red Crosses or different organizations. We pooled our resources and asked what it would take to acknowledge that this piece of land belongs to such and such a person, how we would go about designing that. So we designed a process. For some, it's the first piece of paper that shows they actually have some sort of ownership title to the place.
We kind of created a system in Haiti, to a certain extent.