It's quite different. It's much smaller, mobile, and modular, so we are able to tailor the hospital to the size and nature of the event to which we're responding. For instance, when we got called to respond to the cholera outbreak in Haiti, we took pieces of the hospital—if I could put it that way—and we composed the initial team based on what we knew we were going to need in-country. We have that capacity to be very flexible and very fast.
Also, that particular initiative to build that capacity in this hemisphere speaks to our wanting to have more capacity to respond to events in the Americas. That's an important thing, given what we are seeing in terms of trends in this region, that it's important to be able to respond. As we've said often within the Canadian Red Cross and within the Red Cross family, if an event happens in the Caribbean, we, as Canada, should be among the first there to respond. These are our neighbours. It's great if Norway or Japan can also join in, but in fact it's our responsibility in our own neighbourhood to be part of the arrangements we have among countries in our area. And I'm speaking as the Red Cross. We have that understanding that in a sense there are gradations of response: you know, your neighbour responds first, the same thing as in a village; if you actually need more help, then the people down the road will help. We see ourselves as that, in terms of our proximity to the Caribbean and proximity to Central America and to South America. It leaves us with a certain responsibility and certain opportunities to be very engaged.