I would just add that if you take a look at the way the legislation is drafted, there's a delicate balance between the value systems we have as Canadians, which were built over many centuries and which basically prevent governments from arbitrarily removing, without substantial evidence, assets that belong to citizens, meaning that you would go to a judge and that independent authority would sanction that removal, and the need to act quickly in an environment where we have a world that is in turmoil.
The delicate balance was created by only freezing those assets rather than seizing those assets--seeing the difference is a really major point--and also by having provisions in the act to allow those who feel hard done by to approach the courts for review. Also, the period of time for which the government may freeze is five years. Clearly, it could be renewable, but it's five years. In other countries, such as Switzerland, it's 10 years. Still others have different periods of time.