Actually, there is a capacity in the legislation for seizure in the event that it is the route the government.... This is framework legislation, so the order in council can contain any of the measures listed here. It may be that seizure is one of the mechanisms. I think what is contemplated, and you heard both ministers speak at the outset, is really a preservation regime to hold things in place. So if people have a yacht, we let them keep it. We don't want them to sell it and transfer the assets out of Canada. If they have an apartment block, there's an ability to create the exemption so that they can continue to have tenants and run it, but they won't sell it and transfer the assets out.
The contemplation, the objective, isn't for the Government of Canada, unlike under the terrorist financing regime, unlike under the proceeds of crime regime, where the thresholds have been met, to be seizing and managing property. The contemplation is that it will really be geared towards preservation. That isn't to say that were a particular case to become known and the assets that are located are, for instance, a bag of diamonds somewhere.... It may be that in certain instances you want to have an ability to seize. So it is in there. It's just the extent to which it will be invoked.