Thank you.
I would like to supplement that answer, with your permission, with two brief quotations. As was said, there was an outside evaluation done of the performance of our office in Geneva. I would like to briefly cite the evaluator:
The telephone interviews conducted with the board members (as well as with the president of Rights and Democracy and other organization managers) suggested that there were profound differences of opinion between the board (its chair and vice-chair in particular) and the managers of Rights and Democracy with regard to the European office. Among the general concerns, which went beyond the scope of the European office alone, was the matter of whether the European office (or the headquarters) had contributed directly or indirectly, financially or otherwise, to implementation of follow-up to the UN World Conference on Racism (Durban II).
Here's the last quotation of David Matas, from a letter dated January 2009, entitled "Unravelling":
The United Nations is notoriously obsessed with beating up on Israel. Was the UN/Geneva money, like the three grants, being spent on that? In particular, was it being spent on the Durban review conference on racism held in Geneva which Canada had decided to boycott?