That's a very good question. We constantly ask ourselves that one, but we don't really have an answer.
We don't have an answer because the board members never gave us a clear idea of what they wanted. On the other hand, in view of their actions, it is clear that, in their minds, the Middle East was a problem region. That's the first point.
Second, I believe it's a matter of power. Some members want to completely control this public institution, which receives $11 million a year. They want to be subject to no control and will not allow their way of doing things to be questioned in any way. When they started treating Mr. Beauregard not as the president of the organization, but as an employee who had to systematically obey Mr. Braun's orders, the situation became unacceptable for both Mr. Beauregard and us.
There is a difference of interests. It's a matter of power. Some members have an ideological point of view on certain subjects. There is also a problem of incompetence, a lack of knowledge of the way the institution operates, the board.
In my opinion, these are the three factors that led to this crisis.