I certainly have no intention of doing anything other than that, but I just want to ask a question with respect to one other fact. I've been involved as a board member of innumerable organizations in the private sector and the public sector. I've been a manager of organizations. I've worked in law firms. I have never heard of a situation, and Mr. Matas commented on this, where a review was done of the work of a senior employee, in this case the president, and he was not shown the results before a final determination was made on whether or not it was a fair evaluation.
You've talked a lot about fairness and the duty of fairness. How does it match with the duty of fairness that a president has to make a request for information before seeing the document? Don't you find it unusual that somebody would get what, in effect, was a negative evaluation and not be shown it, and not be given an opportunity to respond to it, before it's passed to the Privy Council?