Since I addressed this issue, I certainly don't mind answering it. The performance review that was sent to the Privy Council was an advisory one; it wasn't constitutive, and the actual decisions on the performance review were made by the Privy Council. The decisions were about a pay raise—actually, they were about a bonus. Rights and Democracy got a legal opinion about this stating that it was a confidence of the Privy Council and that only the Privy Council could release it.
I wrote to the Privy Council and asked that they release the review publicly, because there's a lot of dispute about it. They wrote back to me and said, your lawyers should talk to our lawyers. I was just trying to avoid a legal expense, so I left it at that. However, because this was advice given to the Privy Council, Rémi Beauregard got the review. He had different views, and he did express contrary views. Then it would have been up to the Privy Council to decide what to do, and that strikes me as fair.