That's not correct. We're saying if you disagree with the mandate... We had Conservatives, we had NDP on the board. They respected the mandate of the organization, which is that you act in accordance with the International Bill of Human Rights. That's your governing imperative. You do not act with respect to protecting certain states from criticism or criticizing other states that don't deserve it. You use the International Bill of Human Rights as the standard.
By the way, when you appoint a Speaker in the House of Commons, once he becomes Speaker, he leaves his politics behind. It's the same with the people who should be on the board of Rights and Democracy—