In community development aspects, when you raise expectations and you make commitments, you need to live up to those commitments. If you don't live up to those commitments, then you're going to be faced with controversy with those communities. As anyone who has an agreement with a partner knows, if the partner decides to back away from the table, that's not going to make you very happy. It's been my experience that controversy can happen when you've changed those...or the expectations are a mismatch, and we see controversy in terms of reaction in that regard.
In terms of the kind of global benefit of this sector as well, ICMM has some great case studies of countries--Ghana, Chile, etc.--and how the whole private-sector aspect of mining has contributed to the well-being of the country itself. Botswana is a great example of how the country has really benefited and invested their mineral wealth, to the point where they are now sort of a have-not in terms of looking at aid aspects. So there are some really good case examples out there, and available in literature, to describe that.
In terms of specific aspects of gathering the benefits per se, unfortunately, our industry is really trying to talk a lot more about that. We've been very silent about the aspects that the industry has done in terms of community development and the contributions to that, because the industry has said that this is just part of business and we don't really want to advertise that all that much. People want to know more about it, so there's been much more information in terms of reports and much more thorough reporting on corporate social responsibility aspects, to really get that information out and to try to get the economic components more in terms of quantifiable numbers instead of quality.