It's a great question. In fact, in some ways I'd like to think a little bit more about it and come back with a more fulsome answer. Just thinking off the top of my head, I can think of a number of areas; for example, the quality of the court system, but even statistical agencies and the development of data. Some countries are better than others in doing that, but it's important to have it. There's always a challenge in some countries in trying to work with, let's say, a population that you cannot register, or when you cannot impose, let's say, a personal income tax.
A Belgian friend of mine worked in Côte d'Ivoire. He asked how many taxpayers they had under the personal income tax system, and the minister of finance said he would get that answer in four days, and they showed him a room in which all the files were piled up. This is the idea that computerization just hadn't quite gotten there yet.
That is what I mean by capacity-building. There are very simple things that we take for granted in terms of what we do very well. But they can be built up; that requires a longer-term relationship with a country. That's why I encourage you to think about focus. You're not going to solve every problem in every part of the world, but the zone in which we can really deal with the issues is where we have a presence.
I'd like to see CIDA itself become more like the U.K. agency—I forget its name now—and the Norwegians' and others. They don't just give money; they get some teams themselves to participate and work with certain countries, if they don't go through the World Bank. I think we could pick a few countries that we might like to sponsor ourselves so that it's our brand that's working in those countries.