Chair, I have a point of order. I know we're getting close to our adjournment time; I want to make sure I get to make it today.
We've had about four or five meetings on this study that we're doing. One of the concerns we're beginning to have, on this side of the table, anyway, is that we've only had one opposition witness called. We have suggested witnesses, by the way, who would really have balanced out the discussion and who are Ottawa-based. We're not seeing the problem as a logistical problem—to call opposition witnesses, if they're so far away, or inaccessible—but more as a political one.
At the committee level we were really hoping we could work collaboratively and have balance as we debate this issue. Here we are talking about a huge cultural shift in how our development policy works and about possibly changing direction, so we need a balanced debate. So far, we're feeling that the study is so one-sided that it's difficult to get into a debate or a fair discussion.
My question is, how many more meetings do we have for this study? We're really hoping that now we will begin to get more of the other point of view, so that we can have more balance as we move forward.