I will. I'll let him jump right in there, but he is representing the policy group, so he may not be aware of all these details. However, he is an expert here, and he might know as well.
We are reflected as having a high percentage because, in the context of overall intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance--anything that flies looking down--if we demarcate that which is assigned to maritime patrol, we just have that many more assets on the ground than others. If you look at all of the ISR hours--the drones and anything that overflies land as well--we would have a smaller percentage overall.
Is there anything you'd like to add to that, Mike?