Sure. I'm convinced that's true.
Another dimension of sustainability is what you do with the resources. If you just use them for distribution and you just hand them out to the population, as they do, for example, in so many countries in the Middle East, you end up with nothing being invested.
Another thing that we hope this committee will do is to take a look, for example, at the Norwegian fund, which is one of the best and one of the first sovereign wealth funds created, and the way in which it invested the funds, in order to generate a resource flow, in order to see some return on the investment, rather than just using the funds as current income.
Sustainability comes a lot in that dimension, but it also comes in not allowing—I hope the Dutch don't mind this—what is known as the Dutch disease. It's what happens to a country when the resource flows distort the relative prices. What happens then is that the rest of the economy does not develop. That's a big danger for a country like South Sudan, which has to open up its entrepreneurial capacity and begin to see other types of industries develop. If the relative prices get distorted and the government uses the funds just to pacify the population, you don't get sustainability. You end up in a worse position than you were.