I'd be happy to. It's very different, obviously, from a free trade agreement where there are much more measurable consequences to actions taken or not taken and where there may even be penalties of a sort. This is a political agreement. Really, it's a matter of discussion and being able to come to agreement where we think there may have been differences in the implementation of various cooperation agreements. It sounds so bureaucratic, doesn't it, John?
I think the process is quite simple. If there were a disagreement with regard to any commitments, let's say with regard to implementation of our cooperation on the ground in a certain region, these would be brought up through the senior officials' channels on the margins of any meetings we were having.
We also have--and this will continue--a joint cooperation committee. This committee meets on an annual basis. It just met this past January. This is really the best avenue to be able to raise, in an environment much like this, any issues of concern with regard to interpretation or application.