You are right. There is sometimes a degree of confusion. They are very different. They are completely separate negotiations and separate agreements. The comprehensive cconomic and trade agreement, obviously, is on commercial matters related to trade and investment. The strategic partnership agreement is focused solely on political cooperation, most of that within international fora such as the UN, the G-8, or the G-20.
We are seeking very carefully, as I said in my statement, to avoid any overlaps with any agreement, including the CETA. It's a principle of good legal practice to make sure there is no difficulty in interpreting our various commitments and no ambiguity. I would say that although they are being negotiated at the same time, there is no direct linkage. They are separate agreements that will run the course on separate tracks.