It depends on the diaspora group. If you look at diasporas, the characteristics differ by country of origin and they also differ by country and place of settlement. So the huge difference is, for example, in the Haitian diaspora in Brooklyn and the Haitian diaspora in Miami in terms of business engagement, political engagement, and differences with the community in Montreal.
The best example of this is India, where the flood of investment in IT and other things in India was largely enabled by the Indian diaspora in Silicon Valley. You had people who knew India, relatives, and knew the system back home, but were through and through 100% Microsoft. They worked their way up through Microsoft or through Google or through another company and the U.S. company would trust this person enough, because they were 100% Microsoft, to go back and set up an operation in a country where the U.S. company didn't know the business environment and they wouldn't normally risk investment. So that's been hugely important.
Again, the problem with Canada is we do not have the research on this. In the United States we have remittance flows down to the county. If you look at a map of Georgia, you can see how much money is coming from certain counties and where it's going. We know extremely little, almost nothing, about this phenomenon in Canada, so research is desperately needed. The best we get are estimates from USAID about what's going on. We just haven't done the research. But there's huge potential, and we see this potential being realized in projects. USAID, the French, the Spanish are using these projects to increase development outcomes, create development actors--