I'm not sure I can answer that question right away, because in many countries, in the current moment, mining companies have a lot of room to manoeuvre, and that is one of the things we should point out. That's why I have argued very strongly for this separation.
In many countries that are now liberalized, we see that certain mining codes that have been introduced have been taken from mining company examples or have been informed with the help of mining companies. In many more situations you could say that the balance is on the side of the mining companies already, because they have played a large role in helping to set up the legal frameworks within which they operate.
That's why I think it's so important to stress much more separation between these tasks: it's because we've seen, even in a formal way, so much blurring of influence, and that has set the balance to the advantage of the companies at the expense of other public interests.
Is that a good answer to your question?