They really have to overlap, because if they're out of whack, then it doesn't work over the long term. We're interested in a partnership that stays together and produces what we think will be a multiple of benefits. If a tremendous amount of benefits accrue to the private sector partner but little or nothing accrues to the country or to the people who live there, then that would not be a public-private partnership we would be interested in.
On the other hand, if all the benefits accrue to the locality, we know that there is a high likelihood that the private company will exit that opportunity well before the term of it. We're looking for that balance where they truly overlap—and to be honest with ourselves about where there's a bridge too far.