I think there are different ways of doing what we call a “pay for performance” style of aid, results-based. I'm sure many of you are aware of or have met with members of the GAVI Alliance, which is around vaccines and ensuring that.... This is a similar approach in some respects. You're paying for particular benchmarks being met.
There are, of course, many private sector players who are involved in these types of schemes. In many respects, that is a vital community to engage. In the case of cash-on-delivery aid, the real focus that's put on the government we would be engaging with in this contract is choosing for themselves what is the best pathway to success. What that really means is that if they believe that engaging a private sector partner to achieve that result is the best way to success, then that's what they should do. If it means that they engage a Canadian non-governmental organization to help them achieve that goal, that's what they should do.
At the end of the day, the idea is that the result is what matters. What people at a community level, at a country level, receive in terms of services—that's where the rubber hits the pavement, and that's what matters.