Most certainly.
The weapons that we would consider to be for civilian use are commonly used by criminals in developing countries, and I would say in many countries. They're used by criminals and by terrorists.
I think the Canadian government's approach that we heard about earlier today is quite appropriate: not to look at the type of weapon—because any weapon can be adapted for bad use—but to look at the end users themselves. I think this is a much more fruitful discussion than trying to eliminate a class of weapons, because weapons can be used for all sorts of things.