I have a quick comment. I think the last example Mark was using is a little bit off, at least from where I see it.
Canada should not necessarily be going to the environment minister of the country and saying this is what you should do or this is how you can do it. The likelihood is that if they don't have good governance, he probably doesn't have the tools with which to do it.
We're taking one step back from that. We're looking to empower the parliamentarians to represent the people of the country to the executive, of which the environment minister or the mines minister is a member. We're talking about empowering the parliamentarians so that the will of the people of the given country can be shown in the government, in the governing, and the mines minister or the energy minister would have the capacity to be able to do that.
My own perspective is that I don't think Canadians should be telling the indigenous mines minister what to do. I think we should be giving him the power and the tools to do what the people of his country want to do.
There's a difference between the two. I don't know if I'm doing a good job of explaining it.