I understand, but would you not agree that this is something that needs to be clarified?
If your principle, in approaching this bill, is to limit bulk water exports to 20-litre containers, and it's not actually contained within the bill, would you not agree there's a loophole? You could be looking at containers that are many, many times that size, and in a way, that's a loophole, through bulk removal of water, that can then be used for export, which is a concern that many organizations have raised as well.
Would you not agree that it bears to be clarified?