This is very interesting, because what we're saying here, as I understand it, is that it will be okay for a province to pool water for a hydroelectric dam even if there are environmental consequences. We're sort of contradicting the fact that we're trying to minimize environmental consequences. Then we're saying, well, let's go to the border, and if you're increasing the flow at the border, which would obviously be for the purpose of exporting water, that would be prohibited.
On the one hand we're contradicting our desire to minimize environmental consequences, and on the other hand, it seems again like a trade bill, if you follow me. I'd be interested in your comments on that.