I believe Mr. Dechert has referred to two amendments to clause 13. The first would simply amend the definition of international river improvement and add the single word “pipeline”. The purpose of that amendment would be to clarify that a pipeline would constitute an improvement for the purpose of the International River Improvements Act. Thus, the pipeline would require a licence in the same way that a dam or a canal or reservoir, etc. would. We believe that this is implicit in the definition but there is no harm in clarifying this fact.
That's the first amendment.
I apologize. I didn't completely follow things. Did you also move the second amendment? Do you need me to speak to that?