Thank you.
I want to go back to the issue of working with the partners on the Arctic Council, because I think that's quite clearly what has happened in the past and has been very successful. Sweden, in the previous chairmanship of the Arctic Council, set up a four-year agenda.
The two-year agenda for an organization like this is going to be very difficult, because of course it doesn't give you much time to accomplish the things that need to be accomplished, especially if you're taking a direction that's obviously a little different from what the other countries were looking for.
Have you entered into any discussions with the United States, which is going to be the next chair of the Arctic Council, in order to work on an agenda that could provide some kind of continuity through four years rather than simply two years?