No. I think the key message is that these are our internal waters. This means we get to control access. It's always been very clear. I'm sure you've heard from Foreign Affairs. One of our big messages is that Canada is open for business. We're a coastal state. We're also a maritime nation. We access the waters of other countries around the world; they access ours. The key is that they must do so according to Canadian regulations.
If we choose to regulate our domestic laws regarding passage through Canadian waters, including Arctic waters, with those of the International Maritime Organization—if they get around to a mandatory polar code—that's our prerogative as a sovereign state with sovereignty over the Arctic waters. In that sense, it precludes a treaty. The big question is, a treaty with whom? Again, it's not an issue of ownership of the waters or the islands. That's crystal clear to all of us now. There were so many misconceptions perpetuated about that at one time that it leaves lingering doubts in some people's minds. Those doubts should not be there. These are Canadian waters.
Now, there's a question about transit status, not in Canada but—