Sure.
First of all, it's a great question. I think governments and people can only address what they're capable of addressing. I believe from a macro perspective it is very important to be concerned about and to try to figure out on a global scale how to address climate change overall.
From a Canadian perspective, the classic saying is that you play with the hand that's dealt to you. Given the opportunities that exist and the choice between addressing them and exploiting them or not addressing them and not exploiting them, in a careful, structured and managed way, one would always err on the creation of value and growth for the country. It's important, though, on a very personal level, from my family's perspective, to do so in an environmentally careful way, given the opportunity to do that.
No one thought about it 50 years ago. No one had the opportunity to address exploration in an environmentally friendly way, and why would one, back then? It wasn't part of the mindset. However, the world has changed, appropriately, so today, if we can take advantage of the same exploration or better discovery processes and do so in an environmentally friendly way, then do it, but do it in the best interests of our constituency, which is this country and the local people we are benefiting as well.
Does that help?